Nawal Singh v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The court modified an oral order dated 20-08-2016 regarding bail for the petitioner. It directed that a clerical error stating the petitioner was not named in the first informant report be amended to accurately reflect that he was named.
What did the court decide?
The order dated 20-08-2016 is modified to correct the statement regarding the petitioner's naming in the first informant report.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34288 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2016 Thana -GOPALPUR District- PATNA
====================================================== 1. Nawal Singh, Son of late Shiv Shankar Singh @ Shankar Singh, Resident of village- Kampura, P.S. Gopalpur, Dist.- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Bansh Dubey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 3 29-08-2016 This matter has been listed under heading “to be mentioned”. It is submitted that the petitioner was granted privilege of bail by order dated 20-08-2016 but inadvertently, in the third paragraph of the order, it has been mentioned in the order that “petitioner is not named in the first informant report” while the petitioner is named in the first informant report.
Accordingly, the order dated 20-08-2016 is modified to the extent that the sentence “petitioner is not named in the first informant report” mentioned in the third paragraph of the order, be read as “petitioner is named in the first informant report”.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
A.K.V./-
U T
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a clerical error in a bail order regarding the petitioner's naming in the first informant report requires correction.
Whether the order dated 20-08-2016 should be modified to reflect the correct factual position.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nawal Singh
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court