The Patna High Court dismissed a petition for anticipatory bail filed by Ramashray Sharma under Sections 379/34 IPC and related mine/environmental laws. The court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate any apprehension of arrest despite the FIR being registered in 2009.
The petition for anticipatory bail is dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33555 of 2016 (2) dt.30-08-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33555 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -46 Year- 2009 Thana -KHIJARSARAI District- GAYA ====================================================== Ramashray Sharma @ Ramashray Singh son of Surendra Sharma resident of Village- Uchauli, Police Station- Khizer Sarai, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party : APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 2 30-08-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
(Vikash Jain, J)
Md. Ibrarul/Chandran
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner has established a valid apprehension of arrest warranting an order for anticipatory bail.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Ramashray Sharma @ Ramashray Singh
The State of Bihar
Vikash Jain
Md. Ibrarul/Chandran
U T
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
