Allowed

Pappu Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC1 Apr 2016CR. MISC./2725/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner who was in custody for alleged offences including attempted murder and hurt. The court noted that the charge sheet was submitted, the injury was minor, and sympathetic considerations applied.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 10,000/- each subject to conditions.

Pappu Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2725 of 2016

¶2

	Arising Out of PS.Case No. -106 Year- 2015 Thana -ATRI District- GAYA
	====================================================== 1. Pappu Chaudhary Son of Karu Chaudhary Resident of village Damodar, P.S.-Atri, District-Gaya (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh(App) ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER
4	01-04-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
	the learned A.P.P for the State.
	The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offences punishable under sections 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504 of the I.P.C Allegedly, when the informant forbade the petitioner not to smoke ganja, the petitioner gave Hasuli blow on his neck causing cut injury and bleeding. Due to the alarm being raised the
	witnesses came and brought him at the police station.

¶3

Submission is of false implication and that there was no intention to commit murder, there is no allegation that the petitioner repeated blow, the injury found is only 2”x1”x ¼” and the cause of the injury has been noticed as hard and blunt substance and as such the petitioner who is suffering in custody

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2725 of 2016 (4) dt.01-04-2016

¶5

2/2

¶6

since 04.08.2015 now deserves sympathetic consideration, charge sheet has already been submitted and there is no chance of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

¶7

The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail by submitting that on the vital part the injury was caused.

¶8

In the facts and circumstances as stated above, considering detention of the petitioner, now he is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge- 1^st , Gaya in Sessions Trial No. 22 of 2015 arising out of Atri P.S. Case No. 106 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

¶9

Abhay/-

¶10

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J)

¶11

U T

Pappu Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pappu Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dhuri Baitha @ Dhri Baitha and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Anmol Choudhary Vs The State Of Bihar

Guddu Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Sikandar Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Tiwary @ Appy Tiwary@Rajesh Tiwary Vs The State Of Bihar

Sadique Shekh @ Sadik Sheakh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.