Disposed

Vimal Kumar @ B.p. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC15 Nov 2016CR. MISC./26551/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bench extended the petitioner's provisional anticipatory bail. The court noted the petitioner's continued willingness to reconcile with his wife and resume conjugal life. Bail was extended pending further judicial confirmation by the lower court.

What did the court decide?

Provisional bail of the petitioner extended till 23rd January 2017, subject to conditions regarding matrimonial harmony.

Vimal Kumar @ B.p. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26551 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -11 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== 1. Vimal Kumar @ B.P. Son of Akshaibar Sharma Resident of village - Paiyan, Police Station Sonhan, District - Kaimur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Meera Devi Wife of Vimal Kumar @ B.P. Resident of village - Paiyan, Police Station Sonhan, District - Kaimur .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Pathak, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr.Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

5 15-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶4

State.

¶5

The petitioner being the husband of the informant is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶6

The basic accusation is of torture for nonfulfillment of dowry demand and making attempt to cause burn injury.

¶7

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner admits his marriage with the informant and he is ready to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour. Statement to that effect has

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26551 of 2016 (5) dt.15-11-2016

¶9

¶10

been made in para- 8 of the petition which reads as follows:-

¶11

“That the petitioner is only son of his parents, who respect his wife with full dignity and love but she is not paying respect to him of her desire, without wife the petitioner cannot lead his matrimonial life.”

¶12

Similar was the stand of the petitioner earlier when vide order dated 30.08.2016 this Court granted provisional anticipatory bail till 07.11.2013. The said order was passed on submission on behalf of the informant that the informant is ready to accept the offer of the petitioner. Both sides agreed to appear before the learned court below on 19^th of September, 2016 when petitioner was to take the informant to keep her with full dignity and honour.

¶13

It appears from the subsequent orders of the learned court below that on 19^th of September, 2016 both sides could not appear.

¶14

However, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner filed an application on 15.10.2016 reiterating his stand, before the learned court below, to keep the informant as wife with full dignity and honour.

¶15

The petitioner and informant are present in the

¶16

Court.

¶17

It is jointly submitted that both sides are still

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26551 of 2016 (5) dt.15-11-2016

¶19

¶20

ready to resume the conjugal life as they are ready to go together from this Court itself.

¶21

It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that bail bond of the petitioner has not been cancelled.

¶22

In the circumstances, the provisional bail of the petitioner is extended till 23^rd of January, 2017.

¶23

The provisional bail of the petitioner will be confirmed by the learned court below in three eventualities:- (i) on substantial restoration of the matrimonial harmony; (ii) or if the informant gets reluctant to reconcile the issue; and (iii) or if the informant fails to appear before the learned court.

¶24

With the modification of the order dated 30.08.2016 the application is disposed of.

¶25

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶26

P.K./-

¶27

U T

Vimal Kumar @ B.p. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vimal Kumar @ B.p. v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Durgesh Kumar @ Durgesh Das Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Allaudin Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Santosh Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Arvind Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Pankaj Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sonu @ Chandan Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.