Allowed

Ravikesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC17 Nov 2016CR. MISC./26090/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Patna granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case involving alleged bank fraud under IPC sections 420, 409, and 34. The petitioner was already in jail for seven months; the court fixed a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner was enlarged on bail by fixing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the CJM, Bhabua.

Ravikesh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.26090 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -191 Year- 2015 Thana -MOHANIA District- BHABUA (KAIMUR) ====================================================== 1. Ravikesh Sharma son of Shri Paramhans Sharma Resident of VillageLahurbari, P.O.- Mujan, P.S.- Mohania, District- Kaimur (Bhabua) .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dilip Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 7 17-11-2016 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in Mohania P.S. case No. 191/2015 under Section 420, 409, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is alleged to have worked as a vendor during the tenure of Suryadeo Narayan Pathak and Vijay Kumar Sinha, the Branch Managers of Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank, Lahurbari branch. It is alleged that petitioner used the I. D. cards of the Branch Managers and credited Rs. 7,02,206.68/- through different accounts to his account.

¶3

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Vijay Kumar Sinha and Suryadeo Narayan Pathak have already been granted anticipatory bail. The petitioner was also granted anticipatory bail on the condition that petitioner would deposit Rs.

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.26090 of 2016 (7) dt.17-11-2016

¶5

2/2

¶6

2 lac but the petitioner could not deposit the money and surrendered in the court below. No document is produced during the course of investigation nor the learned counsel appearing for the Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank has produced any chit of paper to show that petitioner by using I. D. of the Branch Managers got Rs. 7 lac and odd credited in his account after debiting the same from other accounts.

¶7

The learned counsel for the Madhya Bihar Gramin Bank took adjournment to produce the documents but even today she could not produce any document and again prayed for time. The petitioner is in jail since 21.04.2016. The petitioner has remained in jail for about seven months.

¶8

Considering the facts aforesaid and the nature of allegation made against the petitioner, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhabua in Mohania P.S. Case No. 191 of 2015.

¶9

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶10

BKS/-

¶11

U T

Ravikesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ravikesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Yadav @ Jitendura Yadav @ Jagan Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sabir Vs The State Of Bihar

Dhiraj Kumar @ Dheeraj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sumit Sinha Vs The State Of Bihar

Binod Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar