The Patna High Court disposed of the criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous, holding that the Complainant in the complaint case had died without substitution.
The application was disposed off as infructuous due to the death of the Complainant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23820 of 2010 (4) dt.22-01-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 23820 of 2010
===================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Opposite Party/s
=================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s: Mr. Ajay Mukherjee, Adv. Mr. Ganesh Sharma, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Harendra Pd. (APP)
=================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
04. 22.01.2016 It has been submitted that the Complainant is dead and no one has been substituted in his place and, therefore, the application has become infructuous.
Since the Complainant is not surviving, the Application is disposed off as such in connection with Complaint Case No. 1448(C) of 2009 (Tr. No. 305 of 2009) pending before Miss Jyoti Kumari, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna or her successor.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-
U T
Rajan Kumar S/o Late Ram Deyal Sharma
Maya Hani Kumari W/o Rajan Kumar
The State of Bihar
Shri Vishwanath Prasad S/o Late Ghesita Mistri
Anjana Prakash
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
