Allowed

Sunil Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 May 2016CR. MISC./22197/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Sunil Kumar Yadav, in a case involving offences under IPC and the Arms Act, contingent upon surrender and fulfillment of specific bail conditions.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions including surrender within four weeks and furnishing of bail bond with sureties.

Sunil Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22197 of 2016

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -769 Year- 2015 Thana -KHAGARIA District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Yadav, Son of Shiv Mohan Yadav, resident of village Mathar, P.S. Muffasil, District Khagaria. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Pradeep Nr. Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 2 19-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 447, 427, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶4

Considering the genesis of the occurrence and the fair antecedents of the Petitioner, let the Petitioner in the event of surrender, named above, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, in connection with Khagaria (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 769 of 2015, shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the Court concerned to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria, subject to the following conditions: (i) That

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22197 of 2016 (2) dt.19-05-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (iii) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (iv) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.

¶8

(Anjana Prakash, J)

¶9

S.Ali/U T

Sunil Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Umesh Malakar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Binod Kumar Sah @ Vinod Kumar Sah @ Vinod Kumar Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jitendra Narain @ Jitendra Narain Agrawal Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Abhishek Kumar @ Chhotu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chhotu Saw Vs The State Of Bihar