Allowed

Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC27 Jun 2016CR. MISC./21606/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a case under Sections 323, 504, 120B and 366A IPC. The court ordered release if the petitioner surrenders or is arrested, requiring a ₹10,000 bond with sufficient sureties and subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties if the petitioner surrenders or is arrested.

Lalita Devi Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21606 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -263 Year- 2015 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ====================================================== Lalita Devi wife of Charitar Mistry resident of Village- Baruatta, P.S.Jamui, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ======================================================

¶3

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 27-06-2016

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶6

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case instituted under Sections 323,504,120B and 366A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶7

Allegation against the petitioner is that she along with other accused kidnapped daughter of the complainant for the purpose of marriage with Pankaj Mistry.

¶8

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she has got no criminal antecedent. The daughter of the complainant had love affair with one Pankaj Mistry, who happens to be the son of the petitioner. Petitioner has been made accused in the present case for the said reason. The alleged occurrence is said to have taken place on 11.9.2015 but the case was instituted on 15.9.2015. The delay has not been explained by the prosecution. The other coaccused have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. no. 8499 of 2016.

¶9

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender

¶11

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21606 of 2016 (2) dt.27-06-2016

¶12

2/2

¶13

in the court below within a period of six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, in connection with Jamui P.S. Case no. 263 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶14

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶15

sudip/-

¶16

U T

Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lalita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sonu @ Sanju Roy @ Sanju Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Jageshwar Manjhi @ Jageshar Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Bishun Dev Kewat @ Vishnu Dev Kewat Vs The State Of Bihar

Bharat Yadav and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanotsh Thakur @ Santosh Kumar Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar