The Patna High Court allowed the petitioner's prayer to withdraw a filed contempt application, holding that it had become infructuous.
Petitioners prayer to withdraw the contempt application as infructuous is allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.21502 of 2013 (11) dt.21-12-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.21502 of 2013
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Pd. Singh (App)
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH ORAL ORDER
11 21-12-2016 The instant application has been filed for modification of the order, dated 11.1.2013 passed in Criminal Misc. No.1493 of 2013, which in turn was passed for modifying the order dated 31.8.2012 passed in Cr. Misc. No.28518 of 2012.
Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw this contempt application as it has become infructuous.
The prayer is allowed and this application is permitted to be withdrawn as having become infructuous.
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J)
KHAN/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's contempt application had become infructuous and could be withdrawn.
Rajesh Bhardwaj
The State Of Bihar
Virendra Prasad Singh
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
