Disposed
Ranjay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./20742/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20742 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -DEO District- AURANGABAD
====================================================== Ranjay Kumar, Son of Pukar Singh, Resident of Village- Makhdumpur, P.S.- Raffiganj, District-Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. N.N. Tiwary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 23-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016 registered under Sections 420, 467 & 468 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the FIR against the petitioner has been instituted on account of ignorance and misunderstanding. It is submitted that it was the bank personnel who had asked the informant to re-give her thumb impression and not the petitioner and in that view of the matter, the petitioner cannot be held responsible for any act of omission or commission as alleged in the FIR. Lastly,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20742 of 2016 (3) dt.23-05-2016
2 / 2
it has been contended that later on the informant has amicably settled the matter with the petitioner outside the court.
Learned counsel for the State has opposed the application for grant of pre-arrest bail.
Be that as it may, regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from today, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Deo P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.
(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.)
Sanjeet/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant an order for pre-arrest bail in connection with a criminal case charged under Sections 420, 467, 468 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ranjay Kumar
The State of Bihar
Ashwani Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court