In criminal miscellaneous application for quashing of proceeding, petitioner sought and was granted permission to withdraw application. Accordingly, the quashing application was dismissed as withdrawn. No legal principle is laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.20710 of 2014
======================================================
Vinay Kumar Jha @ Tantan Jha @ Vinay Kumar
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar & Ors
.... .... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat
For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rina Sinha(App)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR
MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
3 20-06-2016 At the length of arguments, learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
In view of the above submission, this quashing
application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)
manish/-
U T
Vinay Kumar Jha @ Tantan Jha @ Vinay Kumar
The State of Bihar & Ors
Rajendra Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
