Partly allowed

Tej Narain Mahto and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 May 2016CR. MISC./19672/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing charges of theft, assault, and criminal intimidation. Noting a case and counter-case scenario where the police exonerated both petitioners. Bail was granted subject to furnishing a bond and sureties within six weeks of arrest.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners ordered to be enlarged on bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Tej Narain Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.19672 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -452 Year- 2014 Thana -DALSINGHSARAI District- SAMASTIPUR ====================================================== 1. Tej Narain Mahto Son of Late Lakhan Mahto 2. Parwati Devi Wife of Tej Narain Mahto Both are resident of village- Ghataho, P.S.- Ghataho, District- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Praveen For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Jitendra Kr. Singh No.1(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 20-05-2016 Heard Sri Kumar Praveen, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Jitendra Kumar Singh No. 1, learned A.P.P. Two petitioners, apprehending their arrest in Dalsingsarai ( Ghataho) P.S. Case No. 452 of 2014 registered for the offence under section 341, 323, 307, 379, 354, 504/ 34 of the Indian Penal Code , have prayed for grant of anticipatory bail.

¶3

It was submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that there was case and counter case in between the parties. First F.I.R. was lodged from the petitioners’ side. He submits that so far petitioner no. 2 is concerned there is no accusation in the F.I.R. So far petitioner no. 1 is concerned of -course in the F.I.R. allegation has been made regarding his participation in the occurrence but fact remains that during investigation no

¶4

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19672 of 2016 (2) dt.20-05-2016

¶5

2/2

¶6

accusation was found against the petitioners and police submitted final report in favour of both the petitioners and both were exonerated.

¶7

Keeping in view the fact that there is case and counter case as well as the fact that both the petitioners during investigation were exonerated by the police, there is no reason to deny the prayer for bail in the event of arrest or surrender.

¶8

Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within

¶9

a period of six weeks from today, let both the petitioners namely Tej Narain Mahto and Parwati Devi be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10000 /- (rupees ten thousand ) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Dalsingsarai, Samastipur in connection with Dalsingsarai (Ghataho) P.S. Case No. 452 of 2014 subjection to the conditions as contemplated under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶10

(Rakesh Kumar, J)

¶11

Praful/-

¶12

U T

Tej Narain Mahto and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tej Narain Mahto and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bauwa Bhaiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Mahesh Chaudhary and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Mandodari Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rajendra Roy Vs The State Of Bihar

Sabri and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Alam Khan @ Alam Khan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar