Ravij Alam v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Patna dismissed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking bail as withdrawn by the petitioner after his acquittal in the underlying trial court.
The High Court of Patna dismissed a criminal miscellaneous application seeking bail as withdrawn by the petitioner after his acquittal in the underlying trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1956 of 2016 (02) dt.04-05-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1956 of 2016
| Arising Out of PS.Case No. -94 Year- 2014 Thana -DIGHALBANK District- KISANGANJ ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
Ravij Alam Son of Shahid Alam, Resident of village- Kalpir, P.S.- Korhobari, District- Kishanganj |
|
| .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Radha Mohan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Suresh Pd.Singh(App) ====================================================== |
|
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER |
|
| 02/ | 04-05-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks |
| permission to withdraw this application since the petitioner has been acquitted. |
|
| Accordingly, this application, filed for grant of bail to the petitioner in connection with Sessions Trial No. 17 of |
|
| 2015 arising out of Dighalbank (Korhobari) P.S. Case No. 94 of 2014 pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge- 2nd, Kishanganj, is dismissed as withdrawn. |
|
| (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) | |
U |
DKS/- T |
Ravij Alam
The State of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court