Allowed

Mukesh Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 May 2016CR. MISC./18561/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, Mukesh Pandey, who was in custody since March 8, 2016, in a criminal case involving multiple IPC offenses. A charge sheet had been submitted, and the petitioner relied on a co-accused's confessional statement, though no direct evidence existed against him.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Mukesh Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18561 of 2016

¶3

Arising out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2015 Thana -MAIRWA District- SIWAN ====================================================== Mukesh Pandey, Son of Raj Mangal Pandey, resident of village - Bhitauli, P.S. Darauli, District – Siwan. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pranav Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶4

4 25-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.03.2016 in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 65 of 2015 for the offences instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 302 and 429 of the IPC.

¶5

The prosecution story, in brief, is that all FIR named accused persons and three unknown went to the house of the informant and made indiscriminate firing causing the death of Jitendra Singh, the nephew of the informant. During investigation, it transpires that it was co-accused Tribhuwan Singh who shot the deceased dead.

¶6

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18561 of 2016 (4) dt.25-05-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

petitioner is in custody since 08.03.2016 and the charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has been made accused in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused. There is no direct or indirect evident against the petitioner. There is no circumstantial evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. The other coaccused have been granted bail by this Court vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 54689/2015, 16469/2016, 41473/2015 and 56166/2015.

¶10

On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Siwan, in connection with Mairwa P.S. Case No. 65 of 2015.

¶12

U.K./U T

¶13

(Sudhir Singh, J)

Mukesh Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Pandey v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Mani Kumar Poddar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sumit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sandeep Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Devendra Kumar @ Munna Vs The State Of Bihar

Brahmanand Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar