Allowed

Ram Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 May 2016CR. MISC./17593/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court allowed a bail application filed by a petitioner accused of misappropriation of government funds. The petitioner, a Panchayat Rojgar Sewak, was released on bail upon furnishing a bond with two sureties and depositing Rs. 25,000.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount and depositing Rs. 25,000.

Ram Kishore Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Money Laundering | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17593 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2015 Thana -BIRUPUR SAHAYAK District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== 1. Ram Kishore Prasad Son of Late Binod Mandal Resident of Village Banshipur, P.S. Chanan, District Lakhisarai. .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nazir Ansari(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 25-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. The petitioner is in custody in connection with Birupur P.S. Case No. 14 of 2015 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409, 419, 420, 465, 466 and 467/34 of the Indian Panel Code.

¶3

The prosecution case, in brief, is that the District Programme Officer made a written complaint to the S.H.O. Birupur Barahiya making allegation of misappropriation of Government fund earmarked for development works under various Government Schemes.

¶4

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 08.02.2016. Charge-sheet has been

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17593 of 2016 (3) dt.25-05-2016

¶6

2/2

¶7

submitted in this case. The petitioner has been made accused due to mistake of fact. As per allegation, work of Rs. 48,000/has not been carried out by the petitioner, who is a Panchayat Rojgar Sewak. Secondly, certain bills for the works completed have also not been submitted by the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in the court below, which shall be subject to the final disposal of the case.

¶8

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶9

In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 25,000/- in the court below, which shall be subject to the final disposal of the case.

¶10

Let the above named petitioner, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate II, Lakhisarai, in connection with Birupur P.S. Case No. 14 of 2015.

¶11

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶12

ajaypd./U T

Ram Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kishore Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Mani Kumar Poddar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sumit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sandeep Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Devendra Kumar @ Munna Vs The State Of Bihar

Brahmanand Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar