Oral order dismissing petitioner's bail application in NDPS case involving 900 grams of heroin. Court rejected bail due to commercial quantity of drugs recovered and directed expediting trial.
Prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.16203 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -150 Year- 2015 Thana -KURSAKANTA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Kishan Rai @ Jamshed Alam Son of Niyamat Rai, resident of VillageShitalipokhar, P.S. Rangeli, District- Morang (Nepal). .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kr. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 18-05-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 08.12.2015 in a case registered for the offences punishable under sections 22,24 and 29 of the NDPS Act, in connection with Kursa Kanta P.S. Case No.150/2015 (Special Case No.19/2015), pending before the learned Special Judge, Araria.
The petitioner was intercepted by the SSB while entering into the Indian territory from Nepal when from the possession of the petitioner 900 gram Tiger brand Heroine contained in two packets were recovered.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16203 of 2016 (2) dt.18-05-2016
2/2
Considering the commercial quantity of recovery, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at present. Accordingly, the prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner is rejected.
rejected.
It is expected from the trial court to expedite the trial.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Ashwini/U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner charged with offences under sections 22, 24 and 29 of the NDPS Act involving a commercial quantity of heroin recovery.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kishan Rai @ Jamshed Alam
The State of Bihar
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
