Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Oral order extending the petitioner's period of surrender by four weeks in a connected case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15513 of 2016
====================================================== Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto Son of Bhikho Mahton, resident of village-Shrirampur, P.S.-Akbarnagar, District-Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Pravina Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Rina Sinha(APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 3 17-05-2016 It has come under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of the petitioner. Let the order dated 27.04.2016 be deemed to have been passed in connection with Akbarnagar P.S. Case No.83/2015 to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur. The period of surrender is extended by further four weeks.
The order dated 27.04.2016 is modified to the extent as indicated above.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
V.K. Pandey/-
U T
Pankaj Mahton @ Pankaj Mahto
The State of Bihar
Ravi Ranjan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court