Dismissed

K. Venkata Rao and Anr. v. The Union Of India Through C.b.i. Patna

Patna HC21 Jan 2016CR. MISC./1535/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna disposed of two criminal miscellaneous applications filed by accused persons seeking quashing of orders under Section 482 CrPC. Counsel for the petitioners moved to withdraw both applications during the hearing. The Court dismissed the applications as withdrawn.

What did the court decide?

Both criminal miscellaneous applications were dismissed as withdrawn by the petitioners.

K. Venkata Rao and Anr. Vs The Union Of India… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.38574 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2011 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== 1. K. Venkata Rao Son of Late Uma Maheshwar Rao Chairam of E.C.I. Company.

¶4

K. Venkata Phani Son of K. Venkata Rao Director of E.C.I. Company Both sitituated at plot no.-A12-13, Panchavati Township Manikonda, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, R.R. District-Hyderabad 500089, A.P. (India)

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus .... .... Opposite Party/s

¶6

The Union of India through C.B.I., Patna

¶7

======================================================

¶8

with

¶9

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1535 of 2016

¶10

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2011 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- PATNA ====================================================== 1. K. Venkata Rao son of Late Uma Maheshwar Rao, Chairman of E.C.I. Company

¶11

K. Venkata Phani son of K. Venkata Rao, Director of E.C.I. Company, Both situated at Plot No. A-12-13, Panchvati Township Manikonda, Rajendra Nagar Mandal, R.R. District- Hyderabad, 500089 A.P. (India)

¶12

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶13

Versus

¶14

The Union of India through C.B.I. Patna

¶15

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : (In Cr.Misc. No.38574 of 2015) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, Adv. For the C.B.I. : Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha (SC, CBI) For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP (In Cr.Misc. No.1535 of 2016) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, Adv. For the C.B.I. : Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha, (SC, CBI) For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶16

5 21-01-2016 These two applications have been listed under the heading “To Be Mentioned” at the instance of learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶17

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38574 of 2015 (5) dt.21-01-2016

¶18

2/3

¶19

The petitioners are common in both these cases. They have been made accused in Special Case No.8 of 2011 arising out of R.C. No. 12A/2011 registered under Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(c) & (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶20

In Cr.Misc. No. 38574 of 2015, by filing an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short “CrPC”), the petitioners have prayed for partial quashing of the order dated 19.11.2014 passed by the Special Judge C.B.I.-III, Patna whereby non-bailable warrant has been issued against the petitioners after filing of the police report in the Court under Section 173 CrPC.

¶21

In Cr.Misc. No. 1535 of 2016, by filing an application under Section 482 CrPC, the petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 06.11.2015 passed by the learned Special Judge C.B.I.-III, Patna whereby he has rejected the application filed on behalf of the petitioners under Section 205 CrPC for dispensing with their personal attendance.

¶22

At the outset, Mr. Khurshid Alam, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in these cases seeks leave to withdraw these two applications.

¶23

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38574 of 2015 (5) dt.21-01-2016

¶24

3/3

¶25

Mr. Bipin Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for the C.B.I. raises no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

¶26

In that view of the matter, the applications are dismissed as withdrawn. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) Pradeep/U T

K. Venkata Rao and Anr. v. The Union Of India Through C.b.i. Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Venkata Rao and Anr. v. The Union Of India Through C.b.i. Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish @ Rikesh Mahton Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Akhlaque Vs The State Of Bihar

Gopal Mukhiya and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sams Tabrej Alam Vs The State Of Bihar Through Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna and Ors.

Bipin Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna and Ors.

K. Venkata Rao and Anr. Vs The Union Of India Through C.b.i., Patna