Allowed

Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Prasad Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Apr 2016CR. MISC./15021/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single bench oral order allows anticipatory bail to two petitioners facing arrest in a criminal case arising from a land dispute involving offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The court grants bail conditioned on furnishing a bond and sureties within 12 weeks.

What did the court decide?

Release on anticipatory bail subject to furnishing a bond of ` 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each within 12 weeks.

Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Prasad Singh and Anr. Vs The State… — Caste Atrocities | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15021 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -19 Year- 2016 Thana -PARWATTA District- KHAGARIA ====================================================== 1. Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Prasad Singh son of Late Nageshwar Prasad Singh. 2. Kanhaiya Kumar son of Late Raman Kumar Singh @ Akhilesh Prasad Singh. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Viveka Nandsingh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sadanand Paswan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 11-04-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

¶4

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 188, 447, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 1 (iv) (v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

¶5

The prosecution case is of cultivating the land for which the informant was issued purcha and possession of the same was given to him in June, 2015.

¶6

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no date of occurrence has been mentioned in the FIR and the accusation is omnibus and general. The accusation has been levelled in the background of serious land dispute. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that the petitioners have no

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.15021 of 2016 (2) dt.11-04-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

criminal antecedent.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of 12 weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of ` 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-I, Khagaria in connection with Parbatta P.S. Case No. 19 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶11

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶12

Amrendra/U T

Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Prasad Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhilesh Singh @ Akhilesh Prasad Singh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Devendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Mauji Mahto @ Bhuwar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Saroj Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Surendra Raut Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Satyendra Kumar Yadav @ Satendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar