Disposed

Pradeep Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC8 Apr 2016CR. MISC./14937/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to four petitioners facing arrests under multiple IPC and Arms Act sections. The release is conditional on furnishing a bond with sureties within twelve weeks, subject to CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail with a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties to be furnished before JM Ist Class, Patna, within twelve weeks.

Pradeep Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.14937 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -151 Year- 2015 Thana -BUDDHACOLONY District- PATNA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Pradeep Kumar, 2. Prmeswar Rai alias Parmeshwar Rai 3. Shankar Prasad Rai alias Shankar Rai 4. Munchun Singh alias Ranjay Singh alias Manchun Singh .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. S.M.Rahman(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶4

2 08-04-2016 Heard learned counsels for the petitioners and the State.

¶5

The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147,148,149,323,353,307,153(A),153,504,506,337 and 283 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶6

The prosecution case is that at about 4 P.M. the police received information that a mob of 30-40 persons has assembled near the Dujra Imambara in connection with dispute regarding possession of land. When the police reached, the mob started pelting stones and resorted to fire on the police and thereby not only disturbed the communal harmony but also prevented the police from discharging their official duty.

¶7

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14937 of 2016 (2) dt.08-04-2016

¶9

2/2

¶10

that the accusation is omnibus and general against the mob of 32 persons named in the FIR along with 70-80 unknown persons. Statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶11

Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on anticipatory bail in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of twelve weeks from today on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned JM Ist Class, Patna, in connection with Budha Colony P.S. Case No.151 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶12

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶13

Anil/-

¶14

U T

Pradeep Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Kumar and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Birendra Ram @ Bijendra Kumar @ Bijendra Ram Vs The State Of Bihar

Pankaj Singh @ Pankaj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Zuber Alam Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ashok Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Devendra Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Mauji Mahto @ Bhuwar Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar