This court rejected a repeat application for anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner's wife in a cheating case. The prayer was dismissed as withdrawn based on a prior decision dated 17.06.2015.
Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.13072 of 2016
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -943 Year- 2014 Thana -KHAZANIHAT District- PURNIA ====================================================== 1. Kumari Priyanka Wife of Kumar Gaurav Resident of Mohalla- Khiru Chowk, P.S.-Khajanchi Hat (Sahayak), District-Purnea. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. D.P.Tiwary(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 22-04-2016 Heard Mr. Singh for the petitioner and the APP for the State.
This is repeat application seeking anticipatory bail in K. Hat (Sahayak) P.S. Case No. 943 of 2014 registered under sections 406, 420, 120(B), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
On the statement of the informant, the F.I.R. was registered against the petitioner, her mother-in-law and husband. They have taken three lacs and odd money in different manner in order to provide job in the Collectorate which was ultimately not provided.
It is stated by Mr. Singh, Counsel for the petitioner that the
husband of the petitioner has since been granted regular bail.
Be that as it may, since his earlier prayer for anticipatory bail was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court on 17.06.2015, I am not inclined to extend her the privilege of anticipatory bail.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.13072 of 2016 (2) dt.22-04-2016
2/2
Prayer is rejected.
(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)
Pankaj/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the prayer for anticipatory bail should be extended in a repeat application regarding the same offence against the petitioner.
Whether the dismissal of the petitioner's earlier anticipatory bail prayer as withdrawn precludes a fresh grant.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kumari Priyanka
The State of Bihar
Kishore Kumar Mandal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
