Saroj Kumar v. State Of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This order refuses an application for anticipatory bail under A.B.P. No. 348 of 2013. The High Court declined to interfere with the Sessions Judge's refusal, citing the petitioner's failure to retract the dispute or take his wife with him to witness for reconciliation. Consequently, the preliminary objection of jurisdiction was not entertained.
What did the court decide?
The application for anticipatory bail stands rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12824 of 2014
Arising Out of Complaint Case No.937 Year- 2011 District- MADHEPURA ====================================================== Saroj Kumar, son of Ramjee Yadav, resident of village Sahugadh Diwani Tola, P.S. and Distt. Madhepura.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Nutan Devi, wife of Saroj Kumar Yadav, daughter of Sadanand Yadav, resident of village & P.O. Sahugadh, P.S. amd Distt. Madhepura, at present resident of Bhagwanpur Tola, Sahugadh, Post OfficeSahugadh, P.S. & Distt. Madhepura. .... .... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surya Narayan Yadav, Adv. For the State : Mr. Nagendra Prasad, (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER
- 8 17-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State. The Petitioner was refused bail by the order dated
- 17.2.2014 passed by the Sessions Judge, Madhepura, in connection with A.B.P. No. 348 of 2013 arising out of Complaint Case No. 937 of 2011.
In view of the retraction of the Petitioner to settle the dispute and to take his wife with him, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.
Hence, the application for anticipatory bail stands
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for anticipatory bail should be allowed in view of the petitioner's refusal to settle the dispute and take his wife back.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Saroj Kumar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
- respondent
Nutan Devi
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court