Dismissed

Raj Kishore Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC2 Mar 2016CR. MISC./10624/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a repeat application for anticipatory bail against a 498A/304B/306/315 case, the Patna High Court refused to extend the privilege due to a prior dismissal without liberty, advising the petitioner to surrender and seek bail from the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Refused to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail; advised petitioner to surrender and seek bail from Trial Court.

Raj Kishore Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.10624 of 2016

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -86 Year- 2014 Thana -DARAUNDA District- SIWAN ====================================================== 1. Raj Kishore Gupta S/o late Mahesh Gupta R/o Village- Aghaila P.s Siwan District Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harendra Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kanhaiya Kishore (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 02-03-2016 Heard the Counsel for the petitioner and the APP for the State.

¶3

This is repeat application filed on behalf of the petitioner for anticipatory bail in Daraunda P.S. Case No. 86 of 2014 registered under sections 498A/34 in which Section 304B, 306, 315/34 IPC were also added.

¶4

The petitioner along with another co-accused had moved for anticipatory bail in Cr. Misc. No. 42701 of 2014. The prayer for bail on behalf of the petitioner was sought to be withdrawn which was allowed. The another co-accused was, however, extended the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶5

Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is evidence or material to show that the petitioner was not present at

¶6

the place of occurrence on the date and time alleged in the F.I.R.

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.10624 of 2016 (2) dt.02-03-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

Be that as it may, since earlier the prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail was dismissed giving no liberty to him, this Court is not inclined to extend him the privilege of anticipatory bail. Prayer is refused.

¶10

Petitioner shall be well advised to surrender and seek bail. In case he does so, the Trial Court shall consider his application for bail on its own merit in accordance with law uninfluenced by the present order.

¶11

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶12

Pankaj/-

¶13

U T

Raj Kishore Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raj Kishore Gupta v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sulekha Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajneesh Kumar Priyadarshi Vs The State Of Bihar

Sulekha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Vijay Rajak Vs Tata Motors Ltd. and Ors.

Rajeev Kumar Mishra @ Rajeev Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Aneeta Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.