Dismissed

Shashi Shekhar Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC15 Sept 2016L.P.A/986/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Letters Patent Appeal involved a challenge to the dismissal of a writ petition. The bench allowed the interlocutory application for condonation of delay. Regarding the main appeal, the court dismissed it relying on the Full Bench judgment holding that the Shiksha Mitra post ceased to exist after July 1, 2006.

What did the court decide?

The Interlocutory Application for condonation of delay stands allowed. The Letters Patent Appeal is dismissed.

Shashi Shekhar Kumar and Anr. Vs The State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Letters Patent Appeal No.986 of 2015

¶3

Arising out of

¶4

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 15510 of 2010

¶5

Along with

¶6

Interlocutory Application No.4111 of 2015

¶7

===========================================================

¶8

Shashi Shekhar Kumar, Son of Dukhan Paswan, Resident of Village & P.O.Babhangama, P.S.- Behariganj, District- Madhepura.

¶9

Manoj Kumar, Son of Kapil Dev Prasad, Resident of Village & P.O.Fatehpur, P.S.- Behariganj, District- Madhepura.

¶10

.... .... Petitioners- Appellants

¶11

Versus

¶12

The State of Bihar.

¶13

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶14

The District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority Madhepura through its Secretary.

¶15

The District Magistrate, Madhepura.

¶16

The District Superintendent of Education, Madhepura.

¶17

The Block Education Extension Officer, Beharinganj Block, DistrictMadhepura.

¶18

The Block Development Officer, Beharinganj Block, Madhepura.

¶19

The Mukhiya, Gram, Panchayat Babhangama, Block- Beharinganj, DistrictMadhepura.

¶20

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Babhangama, Block- Behariganj, District- Madhepura.

¶21

Leena Kumari, W/o Sri Shailendra Kumar, at present posted as Shiksha Mitra, Girls Middle School, Rajni Babhangama, P.S. - Behariganj, DistrictMadhepura.

¶22

Chandan Paswan, son of Sri Nageshwar Paswan, at Present posted as Shiksa Mitra, Girls Middle School, Rajni Babhangama, P.S. & Block- Behariganj, District- Madhepura.

¶23

Rinku Kumari, W/o Sri Mukesh Kumar Mukund, at present posted as Shiksha Mitra, Girls Primary School, Rajni Babhangama, P.S.- Behariganj, DistrictMadhepura.

¶24

Indula Kumari, W/o Sri Siya Ram Yadav, at present posted as Shiksha Mitra, Primanry School, Fatehpur, P.S.- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura.

¶25

Mukesh Kumar, S/o Sri Nawal Kumar Yadav, at present posted as Shiksha Mitra, Primary School, Fatehpur, P.S.- Bihariganj, District- Madhepura.

¶26

.... .... Respondents- Respondent/s

¶27

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellants : Mr. Shanti Pratap, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar Varma, Advocate For the Respondents-State : Mr. Nadeem Seraj- G.P.5

¶28

===========================================================

¶29

Patna High Court LPA No.986 of 2015 dt.15-09-2016

¶30

2/4

¶31

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA And

¶32

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶33

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶34

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)

¶35

Date: 15-09-2016

¶36

Re.: Interlocutory Application No.4111 of 2015

¶37

The application is for condonation of delay of 123 days in filing of the present Letters Patent Appeal.

¶38

For the reasons mentioned in the application, we find that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay. Consequently, we condone the delay in filing of the present Letters Patent Appeal.

¶39

Interlocutory Application stands allowed accordingly.

¶40

Re.: Letters Patent Appeal No.986 of 2015

¶41

The challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is to an order passed by the learned Single Bench of this Court on 14^th of November, 2014 whereby, the writ application filed by the appellant was dismissed in view of the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kalpana Rani Versus the State of Bihar & Ors, 2014(2) PLJR 665.

¶42

The private respondents were appointed as Shiksha Mitra on 08.08.2005. Earlier, the appellants filed a writ application before this Court bearing CWJC No.13931 of 2006 which was decided on 1^st of June, 2007 with liberty to the appellants to file representations which were directed to be decided by the concerned District

¶43

Patna High Court LPA No.986 of 2015 dt.15-09-2016

¶44

3/4

¶45

Magistrate. The District Magistrate declined the claim of the appellants on 30^th November, 2007. The appellants challenged the said order by way of CWJC No.3086 of 2009 which was disposed of with liberty to the appellants to avail the remedy of appeal. In pursuance of such order, the appeal has since been decided on 28^th of July, 2010 by the District Teachers Appointment Appellate Authority (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Authority’). The challenge to the said order remained unsuccessful before the learned Single Bench.

¶46

The appellants are seeking appointment as Shiksha Mitra though such post ceases to be in existence after the commencement of the Bihar Panchayat Elementary Teachers (Appointment and Service Conditions) Rules, 2006. The Full Bench of this Court in Kalpana Rani’s case (supra) has held that no relief can be granted to the petitioners as they were not working as Shiksha Mitra on the appointed day, i.e. on 1^st of July, 2006.

¶47

In view of the Full Bench judgment of this Court, the appellants cannot be appointed as Shiksha Mitra as such posts ceases to be in existence. The appellants cannot be appointed as Shiksha Mitra even if the prayer of the appellants for setting aside the appointment of private respondents is allowed. Therefore, we do not think that any public purpose is served by interfering with the process of appointment after long lapse of time.

¶48

Patna High Court LPA No.986 of 2015 dt.15-09-2016

¶49

4/4

¶50

In view thereof, we do not find any merit in the present

¶51

Letters Patent Appeal. The same is, therefore, dismissed.

¶52

(Hemant Gupta, J.)

¶53

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶54

Sunil/-
AFR/NAFR N. A. F.R.
CAV DATE N. A.
Uploading Date 19.07.2016
Transmission
Date

Shashi Shekhar Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shashi Shekhar Kumar and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ajay Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nooral Amin Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Shailendra Kumar Chaudhary and Anr.

M/s Baba Biswakarma Raw Rice Mill Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Bijvanti Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar Jaiswal and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.