Dismissed

Bihar Rajya Sahakarita Prabandhak Sangh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC23 Sept 2016L.P.A/686/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Letters Patent Appeal, the Patna High Court dismissed the challenge against the order declining to enhance the age of superannuation of Cooperative Society employees from 58 to 60 years due to financial distress.

What did the court decide?

Letters Patent Appeal No.686 of 2014 dismissed; order dated 19.12.2013 declining enhancement of superannuation age upheld.

Bihar Rajya Sahakarita Prabandhak Sangh and… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Letters Patent Appeal No.686 of 2014 Arising out of

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 20122 of 2010

¶4

===========================================================

¶5

Bihar Rajya Sahakarita Prabandhak Sangh, Patna, through its Mahamantri Lal Babu Mishra, Son of Sukhsagar Mishra, Resident of Mohalla Basbaria Tola, Sitamarhi, P.S. Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi

¶6

Badri Prasad, Son of Late Jagdish Prasad, Resident of Village- Bhawanipur Jeerat, P.S. Motihari Sadar, District East Champaran, Motihari

¶7

.... .... Appellants Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar, through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna

¶9

The Secretary, Department of Finance, Old Secretariat, Patna 3. The Secretary, Department of Personnel and Administrative Reforms, Bihar, Patna

¶10

The Secretary, Department of Co-operation, New Secretariat, Patna 5. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna 6. The Managing Director, State Co-operative Bank, Ashok Raj Path, Patna 7. The Sitamarhi District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Sitamarhi, through its Managing Director

¶11

The Motihari District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Motihari, through its Managing Director

¶12

The Managing Director, Sitamarhi, District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Sitamarhi Dumra, Sitamarhi

¶13

The Managing Director, Motihari District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, Motihari

¶14

.... .... Respondents

¶15

=========================================================== Appearance: For the Appellant/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Chittranjan Sinha, PAAG-2. Mr. Ranjan Kumar Singh, AC to PAAG-2. For the Bihar State : Mr. K. K. Sinha, Advocate Co-operative Bank Mr. Shashi Shekhar, Advocate. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and

¶16

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 23-09-2016

¶17

The challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is to

¶18

Patna High Court LPA No.686 of 2014 dt.23-09-2016

¶19

2/3

¶20

an order dated 19.12.2013 passed by learned Single Bench of this Court, whereby the writ petition claiming enhancement of the age of superannuation from 58 to 60 years was declined.

¶21

Earlier, the appellants had filed a writ application bearing C.W.J.C. No. 5752 of 2008 which was withdrawn as not pressed on 05.09.2008. It is, thereafter, the appellant submitted a representation to the Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna for increasing their age of superannuation which was declined on 14.09.2010/27.09.2010. It is the said decision which was challenged before the learned Single Bench.

¶22

The Registrar in his order has found that the decision to extend the age of superannuation from 58 years to 60 years was annulled in view of the fact that the Cooperative Societies in the State are in financial distress and they are not in a position to even pay salary to the employees, therefore, increase in retirement age is not warranted.

¶23

The question is as to whether what should be the age of superannuation is a decision of the Executive. The appellants, an Association of the employees of the Cooperative Societies cannot seek enhancement of the age of superannuation. The decision to extend the age of superannuation from 58 to 60 years was rightly annulled by the Registrar, Cooperative Societies and later the

¶24

Patna High Court LPA No.686 of 2014 dt.23-09-2016

¶25

3/3

¶26

representation to increase age was not found meritorious.

¶27

We do not find any error in the order passed by the

¶28

Registrar, Co-operative Societies which may warrant interference of this Court in the present Letters Patent Appeal.

¶29

Accordingly, present Letters Patent Appeal is

¶30

dismissed.

¶31

(Hemant Gupta, J)

¶32

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶33

Mishra/-

¶34

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R CAV DATE N.A. Uploading Date29.09.2016 Transmission Date

Bihar Rajya Sahakarita Prabandhak Sangh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bihar Rajya Sahakarita Prabandhak Sangh and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s Mohan Bricks Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

M/s Rajan Int Vs The State Of Bihar and Anr.

M/s Indra Eit Nirman Udyog Through Its Proprietor Sri Uday Shankar Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramayan Pandey Vs The Bihar State Financial Corporation and Ors.

Manikant Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Amal Kumar Choudhary Vs The State Bank Of India and Ors.