Letters Patent Appeal dismissed as infructuous because the underlying writ proceeding challenging the impugned order became moot.
The appeal was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.559 of 2014 Arising out of
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 21295 of 2013
====================================================== Sudama Prasad, Son Of Mangalchand Prasad, Resident Of Bodhgaya, P.S. Bodhgaya, Distt. Gaya
.... .... Appellant/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. Amar Nath Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Subhash Pd. Singh, GA 3 For the Respondent No. 4 : Mr. Amaresh Kumar Sinha, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA)
terms of the order impugned in the present Letters Patent Appeal, the Executive Officer, Nagar Panchayat has passed an order which is under challenge by the present appellate in a separate writ proceeding. Therefore, the present Letters Patent Appeal is rendered infructuous.
The Appeal is dismissed as infructuous.
(Hemant Gupta, J)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
Anjani/P.Kumar
U
Sudama Prasad
The State Of Bihar
Nagar Panchayat, Bodh Gaya
Hemant Gupta
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
