The Letters Patent Appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant on the day of hearing or the last date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Letters Patent Appeal No.179 of 2014 Arising out of
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 100 of 1988
====================================================== Ram Lal Prasad Mali, Son of Late Dhanesh Mali, Resident of Vill. Gobarachh, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Rohtas Now District - Kaimur .... .... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Commissioner Patna Division, Patna 3. Collector Rohtas at Sasaram 4. S.D.O. Bhabhua, District - Rohtas .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : For the Respondent/s : ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) 7 27-06-2016 No one has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant today. Even on the last date of hearing, none had appeared to represent the appellant. This appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Hemant Gupta, J)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
mrl
U
Ram Lal Prasad Mali
The State of Bihar
Commissioner Patna Division
Collector Rohtas
S.D.O. Bhabhua
Hemant Gupta
Ahsanuddin Amanullah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
