The Patna High Court dismissed a civil revision application as not pressed since no body appeared on behalf of the petitioners despite repeated calls.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court C.R. No.17 of 2014 (2) dt.19-10-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Revision No.17 of 2014
======================================================
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus
.... .... Opposite Parties.
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin For the Respondent/s : Mr.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER
2 19-10-2016 No body appears on behalf of the petitioners
even after repeated calls.
This revision application is dismissed as not
pressed.
(V. Nath, J)
Nitesh/-
U
Smt. Sunita Devi
Dinesh Yadav
Mahesh Yadav
Ashok Kumar Yadav
Nawal Kishore Yadav
Ram Roop Yadav
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
