Partly allowed

The Managing Committee Sardar Patel High School v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC4 May 2016L.P.A/1164/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed the Letters Patent Appeal, holding that an order withdrawing a school's approval without a hearing is unjustified. The court directed the communications be treated as a show-cause notice, requiring the school to submit a response within 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Communications dated 3-5-2013 treated as show-cause notice; appellant to submit response to Director Secondary Education within 30 days.

The Managing Committee Sardar Patel High School Vs… — Education and Admissions | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Letters Patent Appeal No.1164 of 2015 Arising out of

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4230 of 2015

¶4

=========================================================== The Managing Committee Sardar Patel High School, Balbhadrapur, P.O. Balaur,

¶5

P.S. Kurhni, District - Muzaffarpur through its Chairman

¶6

.... .... Appellant

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶9

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶10

The Director Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna

¶11

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur

¶12

The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur

¶13

The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur

¶14

The District Programme Officer ( Estt. ), Muzaffarpur

¶15

.... .... Respondents

¶16

===========================================================

¶17

Appearance :

¶18

For the Appellant : Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate.

¶19

For the Respondents : Mr. Nadeem Seraj, G.P. 20.

¶20

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

¶21

and

¶22

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 04-05-2016

¶23

Re.: I.A. No. 4868 of 2015

¶24

The application is for condonation of delay of four days in

¶25

filing the Letters Patent Appeal.

¶26

Patna High Court LPA No.1164 of 2015 dt.04-05-2016

¶27

2 /4

¶28

For the reasons mentioned in the Interlocutory Application, we are satisfied that the appellant has shown sufficient cause to seek condonation of delay of four days in filing the present Letters Patent Appeal.

¶29

Consequently, Interlocutory Application No. 4868 of 2015 is allowed and delay of four days in filing the Letters Patent Appeal is condoned.

¶30

Re.: L.P.A. No. 1164 of 2015

¶31

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶32

The order dated 23^rd of March, 2015 passed by the learned Single Bench of this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4230 of 2015 is subject matter of challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal. In the writ application, the challenge to the order dated 3^rd of May, 2013 passed by the Director, Secondary Education remained unsuccessful.

¶33

A Public Interest Litigation was filed bearing C.W.J.C. No. 1402 of 2013 (Chathu Prasad Singh & Anr. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.) for a direction to upgrade Sardar Patel High School, Balbhadrapur, Kurhni, Muzaffarpur so that unprivileged students of the locality have access to the basic human rights. In such writ application, an affidavit was filed by the District Education Officer indicating that a spot inquiry was conducted and it was found that the appellant school is in dilapidated condition and no education is

¶34

Patna High Court LPA No.1164 of 2015 dt.04-05-2016

¶35

3 /4

¶36

imparted and that District Education Officer has made a recommendation to cancel the code allotted to the appellant school. It is thereafter, on 3^rd of May, 2013, the impugned order as in the writ application was passed.

¶37

Learned counsel for the appellant has vehemently argued that the stop inspection was conducted at the back of the appellant and that the order dated 3^rd of May, 2013 has been passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the appellant.

¶38

We find the contention of the appellant to be meritorious. An order which affects the civil rights including such a right to run educational institution cannot be passed without giving opportunity of hearing to the affected persons. Since such an order was passed without giving any opportunity of hearing to the appellant, we find that the action of withdrawal of the approval to establish the school is unjustified.

¶39

Therefore, we order that the communications dated 3^rd of May, 2013 will be treated as the show-cause notice to the appellant. The appellant may submit its response to the said show-cause notice in respect of infrastructure available etc. within 30 days from today to the Director, Secondary Education. After considering the reply filed, the competent authority shall proceed to pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.

¶40

Patna High Court LPA No.1164 of 2015 dt.04-05-2016

¶41

4 /4

¶42

The Letters Patent Appeal stands disposed of

¶43

accordingly.

¶44

(Hemant Gupta, J)
(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)
P.K.P.
N.A.F.R.
U

The Managing Committee Sardar Patel High School v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Managing Committee Sardar Patel High School v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramapati Rai Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Arvind Kumar Roy Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Md. Awais Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Md. Salim Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jagjit Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Most Sihanta Sinha