Allowed

The State Of Bihar and Ors. v. Satyendra Prasad Sinha

Patna HC24 Oct 2016L.P.A/1160/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Division Bench allowed the Letters Patent Appeal and set aside the Single Bench order that had quashed the suspension of the petitioner-appellant and directed payment of consequential benefits. The bench directed the appellants to conclude the pending disciplinary proceedings against the respondent expeditiously.

What did the court decide?

The impugned order allowing the writ application is set aside; disciplinary proceeding to be concluded expeditiously.

The State Of Bihar and Ors. Vs Satyendra Prasad… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Letters Patent Appeal No.1160 of 2015 Arising out of

¶3

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17922 of 2014

¶4

=========================================================== 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Additional Secretary, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶5

.... .... Appellant/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

Satyendra Prasad Sinha, Son of Late Ramishwar Singh, Resident of village- Arai Benipur, PO- Peer Barahana, P.S.- Daniyawan, District- Patna, presently Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division Muzaffarpur West , DistrictMuzaffarpur.

¶8

.... .... Respondent/s

¶9

=========================================================== Appearance: For the Appellant/s : Mr. Anshuman Singh, AC to PAAG-1. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate.

¶10

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA

¶11

and

¶12

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA) Date: 24-10-2016

¶13

The challenge in the present Letters Patent Appeal is to an order passed by the learned Single Bench of this Court on 29.01.2015 whereby, the writ application was allowed and the order of suspension of the petitioner - respondent herein was quashed with a direction to pay all consequential benefits. However, liberty was given to the appellants to pass fresh order of suspension strictly in accordance with law. The other order was passed relying upon another order passed by the learned Single Bench in C.W.J.C. No. 8229 of 2014 decided on 08.10.2014 ( Arvind Kumar Singh vs. The

¶14

Patna High Court LPA No.1160 of 2015 dt.24-10-2016

¶15

2/2

¶16

State of Bihar ).

¶17

Learned counsel for the appellants points out that the judgment in Arvind Kumar Singh (supra) has since been set aside by a Division Bench in L.P.A. No. 1699 of 2014 decided on 19.03.2015 ( The State of Bihar & Ors. vs. Arvind Kumar Singh) .

¶18

For the reasons recorded therein, we allow the present appeal. The order passed by the learned Single Bench is set aside. Since the disciplinary proceeding against the respondent is pending, therefore, the appellants are directed to conclude the disciplinary proceeding expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶19

The Letters Patent Appeal stands allowed in the above

¶20

terms.

¶21

(Hemant Gupta, J)

¶22

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J)

¶23

Mishra/-

¶24