In a second appeal, the High Court of Patna dismissed the appeal as not pressed due to the non-appearance of the parties at the hearing despite a prior order on the matter.
None, the appeal was dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court SA No.61 of 1990 (7) dt.07-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Second Appeal No.61 of 1990
====================================================== Mangal Prasad, son of Hazari Mistri, a resident of Mohalla Jogsar, Swami Vivekanand Road, PS Kotwali Town and District Bhagalpur ………….. Defendant …………… Appellant .... .... Appellant Versus 1. Madhab Mandal 2. Keshab Mandal Both sons of Late Radhe Rai, residents of Mohalla Jogsar, Swami Vivekanand Road, PS Kotwali Town and District Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 7 07-07-2015 Nobody appears on behalf of the appellant or the respondents. However, on the request of the Court, Mr. Sukumar Sinha, learned Senior Counsel has extended his assistance in view of the earlier order passed on 4.1.1991 in this appeal. As no one has appeared on behalf of the parties in this appeal, this appeal is dismissed as not pressed. (V. Nath, J.) Snkumar/U
Mangal Prasad, son of Hazari Mistri
Madhab Mandal and Keshab Mandal
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
