In a civil review of a dismissed writ application, the Patna High Court dismissed the petition as it was ill advised given the withdrawal of the original application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.70 of 2001 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 5200 of 2001 ====================================================== Smt.Manju Sharan, W/o Sri Keshrim Kishore Sharan, resident of Village – Akhagaon, P.S. – Sandesh, District – Bhojpur at present residing at Chitragupta Nagar Near Bankments Colony, Kankarbagh, Patna .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sri Prakash Srivastava Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL ORDER
08. 18.03.2015 Since no case within the parameters and powers of review is made out in the background that the petitioner after some argument had himself withdrawn the writ application, review application, therefore, is ill advised and is dismissed.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) SKM/-
U
Smt. Manju Sharan
State of Bihar & Ors
Ajay Kumar Tripathi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
