The Patna High Court, in an oral order, condoned the delay in filing a review application. Finding no error apparent on the face of the record, the Court dismissed the review petition without engaging with the merits of the original writ case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.43 of 2015 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 14253 of 2013
====================================================== Rina Kumari D/o Ram Bhajan Singh Resident of Village Punahad, P.S. Ghanshyampur, District Darbhanga.
.... .... Respondent/s
3 13-05-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. After hearing the parties, the prayer for condonation is allowed and the delay in filing this review application is condoned. Heard Mr. Chaubey, the learned counsel for the petitioner on the merit of the review application. The learned counsel for the respondents has also been heard.
After considering the submissions and perusal of the
Patna High Court C. REV. No.43 of 2015 (3) dt.13-05-2015
2
records, this Court does not find any error apparent on the face of the record or any other reason warranting the review of the order. The review application is, accordingly, dismissed.
Devendra/-
U
(V. Nath, J)
Rina Kumari
The State of Bihar
The Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar
The Director, Directorate of I.C.D.S. Darbhanga
The District Selection Committee, Darbhanga
The District Magistrate cum Chairman, District Selection Commission, Darbhanga
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
