Patna High Court disposed of Civil Review No.118 of 2014, filed in a writ jurisdiction case involving railway employees, holding the petition withdrawn without resistance. The order is brief and lacks substantive legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.118 of 2014 In
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1342 of 2014
.... .... Petitioners
Versus
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. M. P. Dixit, Advocate : Mr. Satyanand Shukla, Advocate : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Choubey, Advocate
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SAMARENDRA PRATAP SINGH
ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE I. A. ANSARI)
The submission so made is not resisted by the learned
counsel for the opposite parties.
Patna High Court C. REV. No.118 of 2014 (7) dt.06-05-2015
2 / 2
In view of the above and in the interest of justice, this
review petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
(I. A. Ansari, J.)
(Samarendra Pratap Singh, J.)
Uday/-
U
Union of India through the General Manager, East Central Railway
Vijay Kumar Gupta
I. A. Ansari
Samarendra Pratap Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
