Oraal order in a writ petition and contempt application where the petition is disposed of after hearing representations filed by the District Magistrate. No substantive legal principles were laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.49 of 2015 (2) dt.10-04-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.49 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 7709 of 2012 ====================================================== Suman Kumar Singh, son of Diwakar Singh, Resident of village- Borra, P.O. Chaknathu, P.S. Amdanda, District-Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Mr. Birendra Prasad Yadav, District Magistrate, Bhagalpur .... .... Opp.Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar For the Opp.Parties : Mr. Manjari Nath ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 2 10-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
In the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party no.2, the District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, it is stated that the representation of the petitioner has been disposed of by order dated 5.11.2014 passed by him.
In the aforesaid view of the matter, the contempt
application is disposed of.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
S.Pandey/-
(Anjana Mishra, J)
U
Suman Kumar Singh
The State of Bihar
Birendra Prasad Yadav
RAMESH KUMAR DATTA
ANJANA MISHRA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
