The Patna High Court allowed the restoration of L.P.A. No. 902 of 2004 to its original file despite a delay in compliance with a peremptory order, attributing the delay to a clerk's mistake.
L.P.A. No. 902 of 2004 was directed to be restored to its original file and the restoration application was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2682 of 2012
| ====================================================== Chandrika Pd .& Ors .... .... Petitioners |
|---|
| Versus Master Sharma & Ors .... .... Opposite parties ====================================================== |
| Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Mukesh Kant, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, A.C. to G.P. 2. ====================================================== |
| CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) |
| 3 04-08-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned |
| counsel for the State. |
| It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the peremptory order dated 30.06.2015 could not be complied with within time due to mistake on the part of the office clerk but the same has been complied with subsequently. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the |
| case, L.P.A. No. 902 of 2004 is directed to be restored to its original file. The restoration application is, accordingly, allowed. |
| (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Sudhir Singh, J) |
| Singh/U.K./- U |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether L.P.A. No. 902 of 2004 should be restored to its original file?
Chandrika Pd .& Ors
Master Sharma & Ors
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
