An oral order dismissing a contempt application as no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner, noting that the underlying S.L.P. was dismissed by the Supreme Court and payment to the petitioner was directed.
Contempt application dismissed as not pressed; payment directed within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.2459 of 2011 (9) dt.13-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2459 of 2011
====================================================== Arbind .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 9 13-07-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Even on the last occasion, no one had appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State submits that the S.L.P. filed by the State having been dismissed by the Supreme Court, the payment shall be made to the petitioner within a week from today. The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) V.P.Sinha/- (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) U
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
S.L.P. filed by the StateReferred¶3
Arbind
The State of Bihar
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Amaresh Kumar Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
