This is an oral order dismissing a contempt application because no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners, rendering the application unscrupulously not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.211 of 1994 (5) dt.11-12-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.211 of 1994 ====================================================== Kameshwar Prasad & Anr .... .... Petitioner/s Versus State & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 5 11-12-2015 No one appears on behalf of the petitioners even today. The contempt application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
B.Kr./- (Sudhir Singh, J)
U
Kameshwar Prasad & Anr.
State & Ors.
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
