Sanjay Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court dismissed a restoration application not pressed by the petitioner, who did not appear before the court. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
The Patna High Court dismissed a restoration application not pressed by the petitioner, who did not appear before the court. No substantive legal principles were discussed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.2039 of 1996 (4) dt.07-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2039 of 1996
======================================================
Sanjay Kumar, son of Sri Ram Sarup Yadav, proprietor of Hotel Tolson,
resident of Radhika Nath Lane, Exhibition Road, P.S. Gandhi Maidan,
District Patna
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar, through the Commissioner, Commercial Taxes,
Government of Bihar, New Schivalaya (New Secretariat), Patna
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Patna West Circle,
Patna-4
.... .... Opp. Parties
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR
DATTA
and
HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA)
4 07-07-2015 No one appears for the petitioner even today.
The restoration application is dismissed as not pressed.
(Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
spal/-
(Anjana Mishra, J)
U
Sanjay Kumar
The State of Bihar
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court