The Patna High Court dismissed a restoration application because the advocate representing the petitioners could not proceed since one petitioner was deceased and another could not be traced.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.202 of 1986 (14) dt.21-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.202 of 1986
====================================================== Naga Mishra & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Ram Narayan Mishara & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 14 21-07-2015 Mr. Ajay Kumar Mishra, Advocate submits that since the original Advocate-on-record for the petitioners, Mr. Keshav Nath Tiwari, died and Mr. Vinay Kant Tripathy and Mr. Ajay Kumar Mishra, being Advocates associated earlier as juniors to him, had taken steps for obtaining vakalatnama from the petitioners but on enquiry, they were informed that petitioner No.1, Naga Mishra, is dead, whereas they could not trace the petitioner No.2, Ram Barai Mishra. It is submitted by them that they are not in a position to pursue the matter. In the above circumstances, the restoration application is dismissed as not pressed. V.P.Sinha/- (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) U
Naga Mishra & Ors.
Ram Narayan Mishara & Ors.
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Amaresh Kumar Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
