The High Court dismissed the contempt application as not pressed because the application whose order was impugned was disposed of in the main jurisdiction. No one appeared for the petitioner.
The contempt application is dismissed as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.1639 of 2012 (3) dt.18-02-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1639 of 2012
====================================================== Mahesh Kumar Pal .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 3 18-02-2015 No one appears for the petitioner. The present contempt application was earlier directed to be listed after the disposal of M.J.C. No.466 of 2012 and its analogous cases as the order of the Division Bench, on which the order of the learned single Judge under contempt in the present matter was passed, was the subject matter of the said contempt application.
It is informed by the office that M.J.C. No.466 of 2012 with its analogous cases has been dismissed on 21.10.2014. In the aforesaid circumstances, the present contempt application is dismissed as not pressed.
V.P.Sinha/- (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J)
(Anjana Mishra, J)
U
Mahesh Kumar Pal
The State of Bihar & Ors
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Anjana Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
