State counsel submitted that a contempt order was complied with belatedly and the petitioners have challenged the Three Man Committee report in a separate writ petition. The court dismissed the contempt application as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.1512 of 2007 (6) dt.29-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1512 of 2007
| ====================================================== Rana Prasad & Ors .... .... Petitioners Versus Mr.Deepak Kumar & Ors .... .... Opp. Parties ====================================================== |
|
|---|---|
| CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) |
|
| 6 | 29-07-2015 No one appears for the petitioners. |
| Learned counsel for the State submits that the order | |
| under contempt has been complied with though belatedly and the Three Man Committee has already given its report which, in fact, |
|
| has been challenged by some of the petitioners by filing writ petition. |
|
| The contempt application is, accordingly, dismissed as not pressed. |
|
| (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) | |
| spal/- U |
(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) |
Rana Prasad & Ors
Mr. Deepak Kumar & Ors
Ramesh Kumar Datta
Amareesh Kumar Lal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
