Single judge order allowing a restoration application to reinstate S.A. No. 218 of 2013 to its original file after hearing counsel.
The restoration application is allowed and the S.A. No. 218/2013 is restored to its original file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court MJC No.1179 of 2015 (2) dt.01-07-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1179 of 2015 In SA 218 of 2013 ====================================================== Jai Nath Chaudhary & Ors .... .... Petitioner/s Versus Gautam Bharti & Ors .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Irshad Ahmad Khan For the Respondent/s : Mr. Irshad Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 2 01-07-2015 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. After considering the averments made in the restoration application and the submissions on behalf of the petitioners, the restoration application is allowed and the S.A.No.218/2013 is restored to its original file.
(V. Nath, J) Nitesh/U
Nitesh/-
Jai Nath Chaudhary & Ors.
Gautam Bharti & Ors.
V. Nath
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
