Allowed

Shabnam Kumari v. Santosh Kumar Thakur

Patna HC9 Apr 2015MA/550/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed an appeal challenging a lower court order directing maintenance to be deposited in a minor daughter's account instead of the appellant-wife's. The court held the order violated the previous High Court directive and the appellant's right to life, directing future payments to the appellant's account and awarding arrears.

What did the court decide?

Impugned order set aside; direction to respondent to deposit monthly maintenance of Rs. 4,000 in appellant's account; award of arrears from June 2013 to March 2015.

Shabnam Kumari Vs Santosh Kumar Thakur — Maintenance and Alimony | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Miscellaneous Appeal No.550 of 2013

¶3

=========================================================== Shabnam Kumari Daughter Of Sri Chandra Shekhar Pd. Thakur Resident Of Mohalla- Azad Colony, Maripur, Road No.- 3, P.S.- Kazi Mohammadpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur

¶4

.... .... Applicant/Appellant

¶5

Versus

¶6

Santosh Kumar Thakur Son Of Ramashish Thakur Resident Of Village- Hanuman Nagar, P.S.- Singhwara, District- Darbhanga, At Present Address Flat No. 242, Plot No. 16, Arunachal Apartment, Sector- 7, Dwarka, New Delhi- 45

¶7

.... .... Opposite party/Respondent

¶8

=========================================================== Appearance :

¶9

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Shekhar Singh, Advocate Mr. Shree Nivas Madhuvan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rohit Mishra, Advocate

¶10

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA

¶11

and

¶12

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH

¶13

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶14

(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA) Date: 09-04-2015

¶15

Delay of one day in filing the present appeal is condoned

¶16

for the reasons indicated in the limitation petition, bearing I.A. No. 7057 of 2014.

¶17

I.A. No. 7057 of 2014 is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the appellant and the respondent and with their consent, we have heard the matter on merit.

¶19

Appellant-wife has challenged the order dated 24.06.2013 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur in Misc. Case No. 50 of 2009 whereunder maintenance amount of Rs. 4,000/- directed to be paid by the High Court under order dated

¶20

Patna High Court MA No.550 of 2013 dt.09-04-2015

¶21

2/3

¶22

01.10.2010 passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 670 of 2008 to the appellant has been ordered to be deposited in the bank account of the minor daughter of the appellant.

¶23

It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that as per the arrangement ordered under the impugned order, the amount deposited by the respondent in the account of the minor is not being withdrawn and thereby both appellant and her minor daughter are suffering. In this connection, it is also pointed out that in the light of the order of the High Court, maintenance amount was directed to be paid for both the appellant and her minor daughter. The daughter is presently admitted in Boarding School in the State of Kerala and her expenses in Kerala School is being provided by the respondent. The amount deposited is not being withdrawn and thereby the appellant is on the verge of starvation.

¶24

Having considered the claim, we are satisfied that the order impugned not only violates the order of the High Court dated 01.10.2010, but also infracts the right to life of the appellant, as she has nothing to support herself.

¶25

In the circumstances, we set aside the impugned order dated 24.06.2013 passed in Misc. Case No. 50 of 2009 and direct the respondent to keep on depositing the maintenance amount of Rs. 4,000/- in the bank amount of the appellant details whereof is given hereinbelow:

¶26

Patna High Court MA No.550 of 2013 dt.09-04-2015

¶27

3/3

¶28

Name of the Bank – Central Bank of India

¶29

Name of the Branch – Maripur, Muzaffarpur

¶30

Savings Account No. – 3221504450

¶31

It is submitted on behalf of the appellant that she has not withdrawn any amount from the account of her minor daughter pursuant to the impugned order dated 24.06.2013.

¶32

In view of the fact that appellant has not been able to use the maintenance amount from 24.06.2013 either for herself or for her minor daughter, she should be paid arrears of maintenance amount from 24.06.2013 till March, 2015 by May, 2015. Once the arrear of the maintenance amount is deposited, the appellant has undertaken to appear in the court below in G.S. No. 02 of 2010 pending in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Muzaffarpur to contest the custody matter of the child. In the event appellant does not appear in the said case, it shall be open for the respondent to invite the attention of this Court by filing interlocutory application in this appeal itself.

¶33

In the result, the appeal stands allowed.

¶34

(V.N. Sinha, J.)

¶35

(Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.)

¶36

Arjun/U T

Shabnam Kumari v. Santosh Kumar Thakur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shabnam Kumari v. Santosh Kumar Thakur

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anamika Kumari @ Nippo Vs Naveent Kumar and Anr.

Kunal Kaushal @ Varun Kumar Vs Sangita Devi

Amlesh Jha Vs Smt. Pinki Jha

Pramod Kumar Vs N.T.P.C. and Ors.

Nitu Kumari Singh Vs Sri Manish Thakur

Dental Council of India Vs Dr.Sanjeev Lall and Ors.