The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a guardianship appeal following an out-of-court settlement where the appellant was granted custody and allowed specific visitation rights.
Withdrawal of Guardianship Case No. 50 of 2010 permitted; appellant granted custody subject to specific visitation rights ordered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Appeal No.35 of 2015
===========================================================
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant : Mr. For the Respondents : Mr.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA) Date: 29-04-2015
Heard learned counsel for the appellant
as also counsel for Respondent No. 1, with their
Patna High Court MA No.35 of 2015 dt.29-04-2015
2/2
consent we permit the appellant to withdraw Guardianship Case No. 50 of 2010, pending in the court of Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Patna, as parties have agreed that custody of Arquam Nayaz shall be with the appellant. Appellant has also agreed that he shall allow his son to visit the house of his maternal grandfather, which is very near to the house of the appellant so that Respondent No. 1, mother of the child, is able to meet her son on 1st , 3rd Sunday of every month between 10:00 A.M.-5:00 P.M.
This appeal is, accordingly, disposed of
in the aforesaid terms.
(V.N. Sinha, J)
(Nilu Agrawal, J)
P.K.P.
U T
V.N. Sinha
Nilu Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
