Held as infructuous. The Court stated that the petitioner's main grievance vanishes due to a notification issued on 8.8.2015. Pending issues regarding salary payment should be addressed by the authority.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9843 of 2015 =========================================================== 1. Dr. Mrs. Naheed Ahmad Wife of Mr. N.A. Shamsi Resident of House No. 321, Road No. 3H, Near Patliputra Colony, P.S. - Patliputra, District - Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Patna University through its Registrar. 2. The Vice-Chancellor, Patna University, Patna. 3. The Registrar, Patna University, Patna. 4. The Finance Officer, Patna University, Patna. 5. The Head of the Department of Botany, Patna University, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Md. Anis Akhtar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Prasad Bharti =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-09-2015
Taking into consideration the notification no.3054 dated 8.8.2015, the basic grievance of the petitioner vanishes.
In view of the same, the writ application to that extent has become infructuous.
Counsel for the petitioner submits that the question of payment of salary etc. remains. These are issues which should be agitated before the authority by the petitioner, who will take a decision.
(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)
sk
U
Dr. Mrs. Naheed Ahmad
The Patna University through its Registrar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
