The High Court dismissed the civil writ petition for want of prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear despite being summoned.
None. The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9711 of 2004
======================================================
Anant Prasad, son of late Ram Kishore Lal, resident of Obra, P.S. Obra, in the district of Aurangabad.
.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Collector, Aurangabad.
.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent No.1 to 2a : Mr. Krishna Kumar, AC to GP-26
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
6 09-12-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition, though the name of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner is printed in the daily cause list.
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
BTiwary/-
U
Anant Prasad
The State of Bihar through the Collector, Aurangabad
The Collector, Aurangabad
The Additional Collector, Aurangabad
Kamla Prasad
Gopal Prasad
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
