The High Court of Patna abated a writ petition because the petitioner and one private respondent had died without substitution. The case was disposed of accordingly as no representation was filed on behalf of the deceased petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court CWJC No.9085 of 1994 (8) dt.16-04-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9085 of 1994
======================================================
Mostt.Prabha Devi, D/o – Late Guneshwar Yadav and widow of Late Chaman Lal Yadav, resident of village Dhangarha, P.O. – Simarbani, P.S. – Bhargama, District – Araria.
Versus
.... .... Respondents
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER
8 16-04-2015
When the case was called out, counsel for the private respondent no. 4 stated that the writ petitioner died in the year 1999. Respondent No. 4 who is the contesting respondent died in 1998. Both have not been substituted, as such, the writ petition stands abated.
There is no representation on behalf of writ petitioner, learned counsel for the State is present. Considering the aforesaid fact, I have no option but to hold that the writ petition, in the circumstances as noted above, stands abated. It is, accordingly, disposed of.
(Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.)
Rajeev/-
U
Mostt. Prabha Devi
The State of Bihar
The Dy. Director, Consolidation, Purnea
The Consolidation Officer, Anchal Bhargama
Laxmi Bhagat
Navaniti Prasad Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
