Disposed

Maitipe Wimalasara Thero v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC18 Feb 2015CWJC/9079/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This single-judge original jurisdiction warrant directed the Senior Superintendent of Police to examine the petitioner's frozen bank account and instruct the bank to allow operations within two weeks following a court acquittal.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Respondent No.4 to examine the frozen bank account matter and instruct the bank to allow the petitioner to operate the account within two weeks.

Maitipe Wimalasara Thero Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Banking and Recovery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9079 of 2014

¶3

=========================================================== Maitipe Wimalasara Thero son of W.K. Sumanaratna resident of 1847, Crenshaw Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90019 ( USA ) at present residing at Hotel Mahayana, P.O. and P.S. Bodh Gaya, District - Gaya

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Superintendent of POlice, Gaya. 2. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bodh Gaya, Gaya. 3. The Indian Overseas Bank, Gaya Branch Office, Swaraj Puri Road, Gaya through it's Branch Manager. 4. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya.

¶5

.... .... Respondents

¶6

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate For the Bank : M/s. Sheela Sharma and Shivendra Kumar Roy, Advocates For the State : Mr. Arvind Kumar, A.C. to S.C.28

¶7

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 18-02-2015

¶8

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to implead the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya as respondent no.4.

¶9

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the Indian Overseas Bank.

¶10

The petitioner seeks direction to the Indian Overseas Bank, Gaya to allow the petitioner to operate his Savings Bank Account No.1508 at Gaya Branch which has remained inoperative in view of the instruction given by the Dy. S.P., Bodh Gaya in connection with Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No.27

¶11

Patna High Court CWJC No.9079 of 2014 dt.18-02-2015

¶12

2/3

¶13

of 2002.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no reason now for keeping the aforesaid account of the petitioner freezed as a judgment of acquittal has already been passed by a competent court in favour of the petitioner in the trial arising out of aforesaid police case. A copy of the judgment has been appended as Annexure-5.

¶15

Unfortunately, the State, though indulgence was granted on 09.02.2015, has not been able to file any counter affidavit till date. Learned counsel appearing for the Bank has submitted that the concerned Thana Incharge has written a letter stating that the petitioner can now be allowed to operate his account, however, no affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Bank also.

¶16

In such a situation, this writ application is being disposed of with a direction to the respondent no.4 to examine this matter and in case the account concerned was freezed on account of pendency of Bodh Gaya P.S. Case No.27 of 2002 in which judgment of acquittal has already been passed by a court of competent jurisdiction, he would be required to issue instruction to the concerned Bank allowing the petitioner to operate the account concerned, if the same has already not been

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.9079 of 2014 dt.18-02-2015

¶18

3/3

¶19

done, within a period of two weeks from the date of

¶20

receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶21

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)

¶22

N.H./-
U

Maitipe Wimalasara Thero v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Maitipe Wimalasara Thero v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Indradeo Singh Seva Sansthan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Pravesh Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raju Yadav Vs The South Bihar Power Holding Distribution and Ors.

Arun Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kamdeo Jha Vs The Bihar Police Building Construction Corporation and Ors.