The writ petition, filed by trade union members against the State of Bihar and industrial establishments, was dismissed on 16-07-2015 for want of prosecution as neither party appeared in court despite the case being called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8630 of 1998
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER
10 16-07-2015
Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition. None appears on behalf of the respondents either, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties are printed in the daily cause list.
Patna High Court CWJC No.8630 of 1998 (10) dt.16-07-2015
2/2
Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)
BTiwary/-
U
Union of North Vihar Industrial & Establishment Workers
State of Bihar
M/S Prabhat Zarda Factory (India) Ltd.
Birendra Prasad Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
